PICOTS | Inclusion Criteria |
---|---|
Population | Juveniles and adults with RRP/laryngeal papillomatosis (stratification by age groups) |
Interventions | No restriction |
Comparisons | No restriction |
Outcomes | Epidemiology burden: Incidence Prevalence Mortality/survival Proportion of RRP progressing to cancer Tumor progression Note: HPV genotype was also assessed to identify distinct types of HPV Clinical burden: Treatment complications Risk factors Symptoms Humanistic burden: All patient-reported outcomes such as voice impact or HRQoL instruments and utility values Any disease specific and general PRO instruments Utility Economic review (cost and resource use and economic evaluations): Intervention and comparator details Evaluation details Cost-analysis Cost-effectiveness analysis Resource use |
Study design | Epidemiology burden: Cohort studies including historical cohort studies and nested case–control studies Cross-sectional studies Registry/database studies Clinical and humanistic burden: Randomized controlled trials Non-randomized controlled trials Single arm trials Cross-sectional and longitudinal database studies Registry studies Pragmatic clinical trials Cohort studies /longitudinal studies (retrospective/prospective) Case–control studies Analysis of hospital records/database All studies reporting utility values Note: For clinical burden, clinical trials were deprioritized Economic burden: Cost studies/surveys/analyses Database studies collecting cost data (e.g., claims databases and hospital records) Cost resource use studies/surveys Economic evaluations Economic modelling studies Observational cost studies |
Timeframe | Database inception till date (November 2022) Note: For clinical burden last ten years data was prioritized (2012–2022) |
Regions | Global |
Other | No language restriction was used in the searches. Studies with title and abstract in English and full text in non-English were evaluated on the basis of title and abstract |