Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
Fig. 6 | Respiratory Research

Fig. 6

From: Do alternative tobacco products induce less adverse respiratory risk than cigarettes?

Fig. 6

Chronic inhalatory exposures to EC, HTP and CC aerosols induce lung damage. Mice exposed to aerosols from alternative tobacco products and CC for 8 weeks were euthanized and BAL harvested. MPO activity, levels of NE and antioxidant potential in the BAL were measured as described previously [47] and details provided in Additional file 1. Data are presented as bar diagrams with mean ± SE. Difference between two groups is considered significant at p < 0.05 and is indicated by symbols *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 ****p < 0.0001, calculated after performing a non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis rank test with FDR correction for multiple comparisons by employing GraphPad Prism V.9 software (GraphPad; La Jolla, California, USA). We used n = 10 animals for air (5 M + 5F) and n = 20 animals for EC, HTP, and CC (10M + 10F) per group for each exposure condition

Back to article page